Hey there, I saw a post recently that stuck with me. It was a simple exchange—someone asking the universe, or God, or whatever higher power is listening, why they didn’t get the person they wanted. Why, despite all the wishing and the waiting, they ended up alone. The reply was just one sentence: “Because it needed both your prayers.” It’s a terrifyingly simple kind of math. We tend to think of love as a sheer force of will. We convince ourselves that if we just care enough, or wait long enough, or stand quietly enough in the background, the universe will eventually balance the books. We think that our prayer can be loud enough for two people. That’s the trap, isn’t it? The belief that love is cumulative. That 100% from one side can cover for 0% on the other. That if you just love someone hard enough, it won’t matter that their heart is already living somewhere else. It’s a quiet kind of arrogance. Thinking we can love someone into choosing us. But you can’t build a bridge from on...
Hey there, Before I say anything else, a little credit where it’s due — this one began with a conversation. One of those where a friend says something that lingers. This post wouldn’t exist without her — her words, her honesty, her ability to hold up a mirror without making it hurt. So, a friend once told me I was being selfish. And not in a dramatic, scream-across-the-room kind of way. She just said it quietly, calmly, like she’d thought about it for a while and had finally made peace with it. “You lied,” she said. “Because you didn’t want to lose me.” And yeah, I did. Not a huge, universe-shaking lie. Just the kind you tell when the truth feels too risky. The kind where you convince yourself you’re doing the right thing, when in reality, you’re just protecting your own heart. And that got me thinking — what if all love is selfish? I mean, seriously. Why do we fall in love with someone? Because they make us happy. They get our weird jokes. They look at us like we matter. They make exi...